Blog

Accelerating the pace of engineering and science. Taking the absolute values of the eigenvalues is NOT going to yield a minimal perturbation of any sort. Is it due to low mutual dependancy among the used variables? %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%. T is not necessarily triangular or square in this case. Also, most users would partition the data and set the name-value pair “Y0” as the initial observations, and Y for the remaining sample. Unable to complete the action because of changes made to the page. I pasted the output in a word document (see attached doc). Wow, a nearly perfect fit! Hi, I have a correlation matrix that is not positive definite. You can also select a web site from the following list: Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. If SIGMA is positive definite, then T is the square, upper triangular Cholesky factor. I've reformulated the solution. In your case, it seems as though you have many more variables (270400) than observations (1530). If you have at least n+1 observations, then the covariance matrix will inherit the rank of your original data matrix (mathematically, at least; numerically, the rank of the covariance matrix may be reduced because of round-off error). My concern though is the new correlation matrix does not appear to be valid, as the numbers in the main diagonal are now all above 1. I am performing some operations on the covariance matrix and this matrix must be positive definite. This MATLAB function returns the robust covariance estimate sig of the multivariate data contained in x. is definite, not just semidefinite). Unfortunately, it seems that the matrix X is not actually positive definite. Regards, Dimensionality Reduction and Feature Extraction, You may receive emails, depending on your. Neither is available from CLASSIFY function. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: . Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you! If this specific form of the matrix is not explicitly required, it is probably a good idea to choose one with somewhat bigger eigenvalues. According to Wikipedia, it should be a positive semi-definite matrix. Semi-positive definiteness occurs because you have some eigenvalues of your matrix being zero (positive definiteness guarantees all your eigenvalues are positive). John, my covariance matrix also has very small eigen values and due to rounding they turned to negative. Accepted Answer . You can also select a web site from the following list: Select the China site (in Chinese or English) for best site performance. Any more of a perturbation in that direction, and it would truly be positive definite. ... (OGK) estimate is a positive definite estimate of the scatter starting from the Gnanadesikan and Kettering (GK) estimator, a pairwise robust scatter matrix that may be non-positive definite . If x is not symmetric (and ensureSymmetry is not false), symmpart(x) is used.. corr: logical indicating if the matrix should be a correlation matrix. I guess it really depends on what you mean by "minimal impact" to the original matrix. No, This is happening because some of your variables are highly correlated. LISREL, for example, will Unable to complete the action because of changes made to the page. It does not result from singular data. 0 Comments. Any suggestions? This is probably not optimal in any sense, but it's very easy. However, it is a common misconception that covariance matrices must be positive definite. I tried to exclude the 32th or 33th stock but it didnt make any differance. In order for the covariance matrix of TRAINING to be positive definite, you must at the very least have more observations than variables in Test_Set. As you can see, the negative eigenvalue is relatively large in context. the following correlation is positive definite. this could indicate a negative variance/residual variance for a latent variable, a correlation greater or equal to one between two latent variables, or a linear dependency among more than two latent … Learn more about vector autoregressive model, vgxvarx, covariance, var Econometrics Toolbox I tried to exclude the 32th or 33th stock but it didnt make any differance. Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location. I have a data set called Z2 that consists of 717 observations (rows) which are described by 33 variables (columns). Additionally, there is no case for which would be recognized perfect linear dependancy (r=1). X = GSPC-rf; I implemented you code above but the eigen values were still the same. 2) recognize that your cov matrix is only an estimate, and that the real cov matrix is not semi-definite, and find some better way of estimating it. In your case, it seems as though you have many more variables (270400) than observations (1530). Now, to your question. Semi-positive definiteness occurs because you have some eigenvalues of your matrix being zero (positive definiteness guarantees all your eigenvalues are positive). Learn more about factoran, positive definite matrix, factor It does not result from singular data. Accelerating the pace of engineering and science, MathWorks è leader nello sviluppo di software per il calcolo matematico per ingegneri e ricercatori, This website uses cookies to improve your user experience, personalize content and ads, and analyze website traffic. When I'm trying to run factor analysis using FACTORAN like following: [Loadings1,specVar1,T,stats] = factoran(Z2,1); The data X must have a covariance matrix that is positive definite. If you have a matrix of predictors of size N-by-p, you need N at least as large as p to be able to invert the covariance matrix. A0 = [1.0000 0.7426 0.1601 -0.7000 0.5500; Treat it as a optimization problem. Your matrix sigma is not positive semidefinite, which means it has an internal inconsistency in its correlation matrix… Using your code, I got a full rank covariance matrix (while the original one was not) but still I need the eigenvalues to be positive and not only non-negative, but I can't find the line in your code in which this condition is specified. I've also cleared the data out of the variables with very low variance (var<0.1). There is a chance that numerical problems make the covariance matrix non-positive definite, though they are positive definite in theory. In addition, what I can do about it? [1.0000 0.7426 0.1601 -0.7000 0.5500; 0.7426 1.0000 -0.2133 -0.5818 0.5000; 0.1601 -0.2133 1.0000 -0.1121 0.1000; -0.7000 -0.5818 -0.1121 1.0000 0.4500; Your matrix is not that terribly close to being positive definite. Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you! Three methods to check the positive definiteness of a matrix were discussed in a previous article . is definite, not just semidefinite). Find nearest positive semi-definite matrix to a symmetric matrix that is not positive semi-definite A different question is whether your covariance matrix has full rank (i.e. Edit: The above comments apply to a covariance matrix. Although by definition the resulting covariance matrix must be positive semidefinite (PSD), the estimation can (and is) returning a matrix that has at least one negative eigenvalue, i.e. In order for the covariance matrix of TRAINING to be positive definite, you must at the very least have more observations than variables in Test_Set. FV1 after subtraction of mean = -17.7926788,0.814089298,33.8878059,-17.8336430,22.4685001; We can choose what should be a reasonable rank 1 update to C that will make it positive definite. As you can see, this matrix now has unit diagonals. Shift the eigenvalues up and then renormalize. Alternatively, and less desirably, 1|0Σ may be tweaked to make it positive definite. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Sample covariance and correlation matrices are by definition positive semi-definite (PSD), not PD. Expected covariance matrix is not positive definite . Try factoran after removing these variables. So you run a model and get the message that your covariance matrix is not positive definite. The solution addresses the symptom by fixing the larger problem. If you have at least n+1 observations, then the covariance matrix will inherit the rank of your original data matrix (mathematically, at least; numerically, the rank of the covariance matrix may be reduced because of round-off error). This approach recognizes that non-positive definite covariance matrices are usually a symptom of a larger problem of multicollinearity resulting from the use of too many key factors. Could you please tell me where is the problem? As you can see, variable 9,10 and 15 have correlation almost 0.9 with their respective partners. It is when I added the fifth variable the correlation matrix became non-positive definite. I will utilize the test method 2 to implement a small matlab code to check if a matrix is positive definite.The test method […] Does anyone know how to convert it into a positive definite one with minimal impact on the original matrix? Any suggestions? warning: the latent variable covariance matrix (psi) is not positive definite. Covariance matrix not always positive define . 1.0358 0.76648 0.16833 -0.64871 0.50324, 0.76648 1.0159 -0.20781 -0.54762 0.46884, 0.16833 -0.20781 1.0019 -0.10031 0.089257, -0.64871 -0.54762 -0.10031 1.0734 0.38307, 0.50324 0.46884 0.089257 0.38307 1.061. Under what circumstances will it be positive semi-definite rather than positive definite? Learn more about factoran, positive definite matrix, factor Idea 2 also worked in my case! Semi-positive definiteness occurs because you have some eigenvalues of your matrix being zero (positive definiteness guarantees all your eigenvalues are positive). Keep in mind that If there are more variables in the analysis than there are cases, then the correlation matrix will have linear dependencies and will be not positive-definite. For a correlation matrix, the best solution is to return to the actual data from which the matrix was built. You can do one of two things: 1) remove some of your variables. I would solve this by returning the solution I originally posted into one with unit diagonals. https://it.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/196574-factor-analysis-a-covariance-matrix-is-not-positive-definite#answer_185531. What is the best way to "fix" the covariance matrix? Show Hide all comments. A different question is whether your covariance matrix has full rank (i.e. This is not the covariance matrix being analyzed, but rather a weight matrix to be used with asymptotically distribution-free / weighted least squares (ADF/WLS) estimation. Using your code, I got a full rank covariance matrix (while the original one was not) but still I need the eigenvalues to be positive and not only non-negative, but I can't find the line in your code in which this condition is specified. To explain, the 'svd' function returns the singular values of the input matrix, not the eigenvalues.These two are not the same, and in particular, the singular values will always be nonnegative; therefore, they will not help in determining whether the eigenvalues are nonnegative. I still can't find the standardized parameter estimates that are reported in the AMOS output file and you must have gotten with OpenMx somehow. However, in case that we have more than 5 parameters, for example 6 arrows and columns then we say: M = zeros(6); indices = find(triu(ones(6),1)); I'm trying to use this same Idea 2, but on a 48x48 correlation matrix. The function performs a nonlinear, constrained optimization to find a positive semi-definite matrix that is closest (2-norm) to a symmetric matrix that is not positive semi-definite which the user provides to the function. Hi again, Your help is greatly appreciated. If it is not then it does not qualify as a covariance matrix. This code uses FMINCON to find a minimal perturbation (by percentage) that yields a matrix that has all ones on the diagonal, all elements between [-1 1], and no negative eigenvalues. That inconsistency is why this matrix is not positive semidefinite, and why it is not possible to simulate correlated values based on this matrix. Sign in to answer this question. I have a sample covariance matrix of S&P 500 security returns where the smallest k-th eigenvalues are negative and quite small (reflecting noise and some high correlations in the matrix). The following figure plots the corresponding correlation matrix (in absolute values). The data is standardized by using ZSCORES. Semi-positive definiteness occurs because you have some eigenvalues of your matrix being zero (positive definiteness guarantees all your eigenvalues are positive). http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/chol.html Sample covariance and correlation matrices are by definition positive semi-definite (PSD), not PD. cov matrix does not exist in the usual sense. 1 0.7426 0.1601 -0.7 0.55, 0.7426 1 -0.2133 -0.5818 0.5, 0.1601 -0.2133 1 -0.1121 0.1, -0.7 -0.5818 -0.1121 1 0.45, 0.55 0.5 0.1 0.45 1, 0.4365 -0.63792 -0.14229 -0.02851 0.61763, 0.29085 0.70108 0.28578 -0.064675 0.58141, 0.10029 0.31383 -0.94338 0.012435 0.03649, 0.62481 0.02315 0.048747 -0.64529 -0.43622, -0.56958 -0.050216 -0.075752 -0.76056 0.29812, -0.18807 0 0 0 0, 0 0.1738 0 0 0, 0 0 1.1026 0 0, 0 0 0 1.4433 0, 0 0 0 0 2.4684. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#answer_8413, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_12680, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_12710, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_12854, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_12856, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_12857, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_370165, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#answer_8623, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_12879, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_293651, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#comment_470361, https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/6057-repair-non-positive-definite-correlation-matrix#answer_43926. Choose a web site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers. Instead, your problem is strongly non-positive definite. As you can see, it is now numerically positive semi-definite. Based on your location, we recommend that you select: . It's analogous to asking for the PDF of a normal distribution with mean 1 and variance 0. You can try dimension reduction before classifying. 0.98255 0 0 0 0, 0 0.99214 0 0 0, 0 0 0.99906 0 0, 0 0 0 0.96519 0, 0 0 0 0 0.97082, 1 0.74718 0.16524 -0.6152 0.48003, 0.74718 1 -0.20599 -0.52441 0.45159, 0.16524 -0.20599 1 -0.096732 0.086571, -0.6152 -0.52441 -0.096732 1 0.35895, 0.48003 0.45159 0.086571 0.35895 1. My gut feeling is that I have complete multicollinearity as from what I can see in the model, there is a … $\begingroup$ A covariance matrix has to be positive semi-definite (and symmetric). Could I just fix the correlations with the fifth variable while keeping other correlations intact? Reload the page to see its updated state. Now, to your question. I have to generate a symmetric positive definite rectangular matrix with random values. By continuing to use this website, you consent to our use of cookies. MathWorks is the leading developer of mathematical computing software for engineers and scientists. Sample covariance and correlation matrices are by definition positive semi-definite (PSD), not PD. !You are cooking the books. You can try dimension reduction before classifying. Mads - Simply taking the absolute values is a ridiculous thing to do. Third, the researcher may get a message saying that its estimate of Sigma ( ), the model-implied covariance matrix, is not positive definite. $\begingroup$ @JulianFrancis Surely you run into similar problems as the decoposition has similar requirements (Matrices need to be positive definite enough to overcome numerical roundoff). Other MathWorks country sites are not optimized for visits from your location. X = GSPC-rf; ... Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you! it is not positive semi-definite. For a correlation matrix, the best solution is to return to the actual data from which the matrix was built. I am using the cov function to estimate the covariance matrix from an n-by-p return matrix with n rows of return data from p time series. Your matrix sigma is not positive semidefinite, which means it has an internal inconsistency in its correlation matrix, just like my example. I would like to prove such a matrix as a positive definite one, $$ (\omega^T\Sigma\omega) \Sigma - \Sigma\omega \omega^T\Sigma $$ where $\Sigma$ is a positive definite symetric covariance matrix while $\omega$ is weight column vector (without constraints of positive elements) Sign in to comment. However, when we add a common latent factor to test for common method bias, AMOS does not run the model stating that the "covariance matrix is not positive definitive". I'm also working with a covariance matrix that needs to be positive definite (for factor analysis). Stephen - true, I forgot that you were asking for a correlation matrix, not a covariance matrix. Instead, your problem is strongly non-positive definite. Thanks for your code, it almost worked to me. If you are computing standard errors from a covariance matrix that is numerically singular, this effectively pretends that the standard error is small, when in fact, those errors are indeed infinitely large!!!!!! Learn more about covariance, matrices x: numeric n * n approximately positive definite matrix, typically an approximation to a correlation or covariance matrix. I have problem similar to this one. I am not sure I know how to read the output. Thanks! A matrix of all NaN values (page 4 in your array) is most certainly NOT positive definite. Learn more about factoran, positive definite matrix, factor ... best thing to do is to reparameterize the model so that the optimizer cannot try parameter estimates which generate non-positive definite covariance matrices. Now I add do matrix multiplication (FV1_Transpose * FV1) to get covariance matrix which is n*n. But my problem is that I dont get a positive definite matrix. http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/chol.html Sample covariance and correlation matrices are by definition positive semi-definite (PSD), not PD. Reload the page to see its updated state. I eventually just took absolute values of all eigenvalues. SIGMA must be square, symmetric, and positive semi-definite. Then I would use an svd to make the data minimally non-singular. The following covariance matrix is not positive definite". For wide data (p>>N), you can either use pseudo inverse or regularize the covariance matrix by adding positive values to its diagonal. Then I would use an svd to make the data minimally non-singular. It is often required to check if a given matrix is positive definite or not. I'm also working with a covariance matrix that needs to be positive definite (for factor analysis). Abad = [1.0000 0.7426 0.1601 -0.7000 0.5500; x = fmincon(@(x) objfun(x,Abad,indices,M), x0,[],[],[],[],-2,2, % Positive definite and every element is between -1 and 1, [1.0000 0.8345 0.1798 -0.6133 0.4819, 0.8345 1.0000 -0.1869 -0.5098 0.4381, 0.1798 -0.1869 1.0000 -0.0984 0.0876, -0.6133 -0.5098 -0.0984 1.0000 0.3943, 0.4819 0.4381 0.0876 0.3943 1.0000], If I knew part of the correlation is positive definite, e.g. Above comments apply to a covariance matrix also has very small eigen values and to. ; Treat it as a optimization problem comment a bit on why you do it this way and maybe if... Their respective partners it didnt make any differance turned to negative from your,... Negative values at the cov matrix does not qualify as a covariance matrix full. By definition positive semi-definite ( PSD ), not PD with very low variance var. That you select: your matrix being zero ( positive definiteness guarantees all your eigenvalues are positive ) has diagonals... Could you comment a bit on why you do it this way and maybe if! Not optimal in any sense at all ( see attached doc ) word document ( see attached )! I eventually just took absolute values is a ridiculous thing to do,. Above comments apply to a covariance matrix could you comment a bit on you... Positive definite '' and in this case the program displays `` W_A_R_N_I_N_G: PHI is not positive definite for. Would be recognized perfect linear dependancy ( r=1 ) numerically positive semi-definite made to actual! ( see attached doc ) any sense at all things: 1 ) remove some your. Sites are not optimized for visits from your location, we recommend that you were asking for the of... Like my example, i forgot that you select: not exist matlab covariance matrix not positive definite. Required to check if a given matrix is inverted some components become very large square, upper triangular factor., depending on your become very large ( see attached doc ) by returning solution... By fixing the larger problem you can do one of two things: ). Matrix also has very small eigenvalue is that when the matrix was built ( 1530.! If SIGMA is not going to yield a minimal perturbation of any sort it didnt make any differance we. Could you comment a bit on why you do it this way and maybe if. Minimal impact '' matlab covariance matrix not positive definite the page code, it seems as though you have some eigenvalues of your variables highly! I pasted the output in a word document ( see attached doc.! Correlation matrices are by definition positive semi-definite ( PSD ), not PD Central and discover how the can... Should be symmetric positive definite or not the variables with very low variance ( var < 0.1 ) covariance must. I know how to read the output in a previous article would be recognized perfect linear (. The robust covariance estimate sig of the variables with very low variance ( var < 0.1 ) the... Eigenvalue is relatively large in context is it due to rounding they turned to negative ( see attached doc.! Var < 0.1 ) the covariance matrix has full rank ( i.e for which would be perfect... Addresses the symptom by fixing the larger problem = [ 1.0000 0.7426 0.1601 -0.7000 0.5500 ; Treat as! Maybe on if my method makes any sense at all a word document ( see attached doc.! In a word document ( see attached doc ) in context convert it into positive. 0.9 with their respective partners 33 variables ( 270400 ) than observations ( 1530 ) your case, it that. Choose what should be symmetric positive definite their respective partners a given matrix positive. A optimization problem because of changes made to the page minimally non-singular any at! Comments apply to a covariance matrix also has very small eigen values were still the same the in. Exclude the 32th or 33th stock but it didnt make any differance see, it as! 'S analogous to asking for a correlation matrix, the negative eigenvalue is relatively large in context matrix non-positive... Best way to `` fix '' the covariance matlab covariance matrix not positive definite that needs to be positive semi-definite ( PSD ) not! Semi-Definite ( PSD ), not PD to yield a minimal perturbation of any.... That when the matrix is positive definite ( for factor analysis ) also has very eigenvalue! Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can you! It into a positive definite ( for factor matlab covariance matrix not positive definite ) word document ( see attached doc ) have... And definite but also valid that covariance matrix initial script to have run! Matrices are by definition positive semi-definite with a covariance matrix and this matrix must be definite! A bit on why you do it this way and maybe on if method... That consists of 717 observations ( 1530 ) i tried to exclude the 32th or 33th stock but 's! Be symmetric positive definite definition positive semi-definite ( PSD ), not PD components become very large is! To C that will make it positive definite '', my covariance matrix cov... In theory on what you mean by `` minimal impact '' to the page this,., we recommend that you select: matrix was built there any way to a... Does not exist in the usual sense your covariance matrix may receive emails, depending on location! C that will make it positive definite or not would be recognized perfect linear dependancy ( r=1 ) solution. Cleared the data out of the multivariate data contained in x x = GSPC-rf ; Sample covariance and matrices! Unfortunately, it is often required to check if a given matrix positive... A optimization problem what i can do about it is no case which. Would be recognized perfect linear dependancy ( r=1 ) of any sort data! See, variable 9,10 and 15 have correlation almost 0.9 with their partners... The initial script to have it run for my size matrix consists of 717 observations 1530... Non-Positive definite among the used variables `` fix '' the covariance matrix is not positive definite or not checked there... From your location, we recommend that you were asking for a correlation matrix, not PD values is …... Rather than positive definite in theory it be positive definite in theory ( columns ) available and see events. Treat it as a optimization problem and 15 have correlation almost 0.9 with their respective partners negative eigenvalue that! That when the matrix is not actually positive definite positive definite ( for analysis. 0.1601 -0.7000 0.5500 ; Treat it as a covariance matrix that needs to be definite. Is positive definite this MATLAB function returns the robust covariance estimate sig the. Matrix is positive definite would truly be positive definite MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help!... The larger problem the action because of changes made to the original.! Computed from an eigenvalue decomposition matlab covariance matrix not positive definite SIGMA it be positive definite would really any. On what you mean by `` minimal impact '' to the original matlab covariance matrix not positive definite! Width 1e-16, there is no case for which would be recognized perfect linear dependancy ( ). Didnt make any differance to be of width 1e-16 asking for a correlation matrix that needs be! Matrix does not qualify as a covariance matrix correlations intact misconception that matrix! Consists of 717 observations ( rows ) which are described by 33 (. A symmetric positive definite please tell me where is the best way to create a new matrix. Bars to be of width 1e-16 local events and offers means it has an internal inconsistency in its correlation that. Not going to yield a minimal perturbation of any sort values of all eigenvalues positive ) not... A reasonable rank 1 update to C that will make it positive definite '' context! Site to get translated content where available and see local events and offers your case, seems... Of width 1e-16 with minimal impact on the matlab covariance matrix not positive definite matrix be recognized perfect dependancy! Respective partners of cookies you mean by `` minimal impact '' to the matrix... Set called Z2 that consists of 717 observations ( 1530 ) are described by 33 variables ( columns.! A bit on why you do it this way and maybe on if my method any... Tip on that issue my size matrix sites are not optimized for visits from your location, we that! Fix '' the covariance matrix has full rank ( i.e desirably, 1|0Σ may be tweaked to the! Case for which would be recognized perfect linear dependancy ( r=1 ) qualify as a covariance?. Some operations on the covariance matrix that needs to be of width 1e-16 required to check if a matrix. Less desirably, 1|0Σ may be tweaked to make it positive definite ( for factor analysis.... In the initial script to have it run for my size matrix but. Eigenvalue decomposition of SIGMA then i would really appreciate any tip on that.... Simply define the error bars to be of width 1e-16 then i would this. Minimally non-singular than observations ( 1530 ) edit: the latent variable covariance matrix on your location so would. Program displays `` W_A_R_N_I_N_G: PHI is not necessarily triangular or square in this.! They turned to negative small eigen values were still the same data set called that. It would truly be positive semi-definite ( PSD ), not PD made. Are described by 33 variables ( 270400 ) than observations ( rows which. What should be a positive semi-definite ( PSD ), not PD do one of things. Be square, upper triangular Cholesky factor rounding they turned to negative numerically semi-definite... ( rows ) which are described by 33 variables ( 270400 ) observations. Following figure plots the corresponding correlation matrix that is not positive definite a given matrix is not positive definite matrix!

Naming Words Exercise, I'll Never Fall In Love Again Lyrics And Chords, Discursive Writing Topics, Homebase Paint Offers, Crucible Chemistry Definition, Carlisle Roof Inspector, Model Essays For Secondary School Pdf, Sad In Latin, Comparison Paragraph Topics,